Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) has noted with approval the government attempt to amend the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to make corruption in private sector a criminal offence.
“We believe that such a provision could be an effective deterrent and help curb corruption,” it said.
However, FICCI said that it was necessary to ensure that the amended law does not cause undue harassment to businessmen in the country.
“It is imperative that such a law be implemented only after a thorough cleansing of the existing regulations and legal provisions…It is also important to ensure that the amended law does not cause undue harassment to private businessmen in the country,” the industry body said.
The Government’s move was also supported by the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham). Assocham Secretary General DS Rawat said that the body favours such a law which was the need of the country.
Whereas, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) said it was “examining the matter internally”.
The draft Indian Penal Code (Amendments) Bill, 2011, circulated to states and Union Territories by the Centre for their comments, would cover graft by an individual, firm, society, trust, association of individuals, company, whether incorporated or not, which undertakes any economic or financial or commercial activity.
At present, there are no legal provisions to check graft in the private sector.
As per the draft law, whoever in the course of economic, financial or commercial activity promises, offers or gives, directly or indirectly, any gratification, in any capacity, for a private sector entity, for the person himself or for another person shall be punishable.
The Centre has asked all States and UT administrations to give their views on the proposed amendments in the IPC.
According to an expert of Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC), a consultancy firm, penalising errant private firms could be a way to check corruption.
“Strengthening of corporate governance norms and increasing disclosure requirements thereby creating a market mechanism to penalise errant private firms could be a way to check corruption,” said Kunal R Gupta, Associate Director, PwC India.
He also cited a US Law which deals with foreign bribery saying it had a “tremendous impact” in the manner in which companies and persons in that country do business.
“We understand that in the US context US Foreign Corruption Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977 which, in a slightly different context of foreign bribery, deals with the supply side of bribery, has had a tremendous impact in the manner in which the US companies and persons do business and on their compliance policies,” Gupta said.
The expert hinted support to a regulatory body close on the lines of the US’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA).
“Purely based on our experience and information available in public domain, SEC in the US and FSA in the UK have had a discernible impact on the corruption in private sector,” the expert said when asked whether there was a need to have a regulatory body to check corruption in the private sector.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has off late declined to play a CVC-like role to check corruption in private firms saying it was not its mandate.
This article originally appeared on moneylife